Saturday 6 June 2015

Makalah - bahasa inggris - PHYSICAL APPEARANCE & NON PHYSICAL APPEARANCE

FOREWORD


Fortunately we always say the presence of God upon His love, His papers with the title "memo", we have been able to finish well. Writing papers  aims to meet homework of my study. Success and has been the completion of the writing is not released from the various parties that have support, because the author want to thank:
To both parents who always give our prayers, love, advice and enthusiasm every time and To friends who have given us the spirit of giving ideas and participate in writing proposals or papers this scientific.
We hope that this paper useful for the next generation of faculty of letters in SMKN 2 Magetan and all readers. Amien.


Writer



TABLE OF CONTENTS


FOREWORD i
TABLE OF CONTENTS ii







PHYSICAL APPEARANCE & NON PHYSICAL APPEARANCE


  1. Physical Appearance

physical appearance refers to the outward phenotype or look of human beings. There are infinite variations in human phenotypes, though society reduces the variability to distinct categories. Physical appearance of humans, in particular those attributed which are regarded as important for physical attractiveness, are believed by anthropologists to significantly affect the development of personality and social relations. Humans are acutely sensitive to their physical appearance, some theorize for reasons of evolution. Some differences in human appearance are genetic, others are the result of age, lifestyle or disease, and many are the result of personal adornment.
Some people have traditionally linked some differences in personal appearance such as skeletal shape with ethnicity, such as prognathism or elongated stride. Different cultures place different degrees of emphasis on physical appearance and its importance to social status and other phenomena.
  1. Factors affecting physical appearance

Various factors are considered relevant in relation to the physical appearance of humans.
  1. Physiological differences

  1. Long-term physiological changes

  1. Short-term physiological changes

  1. Clothing, personal effects, and intentional body modifications

  1. Other functional objects, temporarily attached to the body



  1. Non Physical Appearance



In ontology and the philosophy of mind, a non-physical entitiy is a spirit or being that exists outside of normal reality. Their existence divides the philosophical schools of physicalism and dualism, with the latter holding that they do and the former that they do not. If one posits that non-physical entities can exist, there exist further debates as to their inherent natures and their position relative to physical entities


  1. Definition

Describing in philosophical terms what a non-physical entity actually is (or would be) can prove problematic. A convenient example of what constitutes a non-physical entity is a ghost. Gilbert Ryle once labelled Cartesian Dualism as positing the "ghost in the machine". [2][3] However, it is hard to define in philosophical terms what it is, precisely, about a ghost that makes it a specifically non-physical, rather than a physical entity. It is not the supposed ability of ghosts to penetrate solid matter, as neutrinos can do that, and lack of mass is also exhibited by photons. Most tellingly, were the existence of ghosts ever be demonstrated beyond doubt, in terms of the physicalist/dualist philosophical debate (at least) that would actually place them in the category of physical entities.[3]
This problem of definition is a problem for the physicalist school of philosophy. Without any definition of non-physical entities, physicalism would be a trivially true philosophical position that everyone could subscribe to, but that would thereby lack much in the way of significance. So physicalist philosophers usually defer to physics, and the natural sciences, for a definition of what is physical and what is non-physical.
  1. Interactions between physical and non-physical entities

As the physicalist school has its problems with non-physical entities, so too does the dualist school. The dualist school acknowledges the existence of non-physical entities, the most widely discussed one being the mind. But beyond that it runs into stumbling blocks.[4] Pierre Gassendi put one such problem directly to Descartes in 1641, in response to Descartes's Meditations:
[It] still remains to be explained how that union and apparent intermingling [of mind and body …] can be found in you, if you are incorporeal, unextended and indivisible […]. How, at least, can you be united with the brain, or some minute part in it, which (as has been said) must yet have some magnitude or extension, however small it be ? If you are wholly without parts how can you mix or appear to mix with its minute subdivisions ? For there is no mixture unless each of the things to be mixed has parts that can mix with one another.
—Gassendi 1641[4][5]
Descartes' response to Gassendi, and to Princess Elizabeth who asked him similar questions in 1643, is generally considered nowadays to be lacking, because it did not address what is known in the philosophy of mind as the interaction problem.[4][5] This is a problem for non-physical entities as posited by dualism: by what mechanism, exactly, do they interact with physical entities, and how can they do so?Interaction with physical systems requires physical entities, such as mass-energy, which a non-physical entity does not possess.[6]
Dualists either, like Descartes, avoid the problem by considering it impossible for a non-physical mind to conceive the relationship that it has with the physical, and so impossible to explain philosophically, or assert that the questioner has made the fundamental mistake of thinking that the distinction between the physical and the non-physical is such that it prevents each from affecting the other.
Other questions about the non-physical which dualism has not answered include such questions as how many minds each person can have, which is not an issue for physicalism which can simply declare one-mind-per-person almost by definition; and whether non-physical entities such as minds and souls are simple or compound, and if the latter, what "stuff" the compounds are made from.[7]
  1. Abstracts

The realm of the mental, and the mind-body problem, does not exhaust the realm of the non-physical. Non-mental non-physical entities include things such as gods, angels, and ghosts. As aforementioned, a demonstration beyond doubt of their existence(s) would place them in the realm of the physical, as far as physicalist/dualist metaphysics is concerned. Lacking such demonstrations, their existences and natures are widely debated, independently of the philosophy of mind.[8][9]
Philosophers generally do agree, however, on the existence of certain other non-physical entities, namely abstract objects. These include concepts such as numbers, mathematical sets and functions, and philosohpical relations and properties. Such entities are not physical inasmuch as they exist outwith space and time. An abstract property such as redness has also has no location in space-time.[10][11] Whilst older Cartesian dualists held the existence of non-physical minds, more limited forms of dualism propounded by 20th and 21st century philosophers (such as property dualism) hold merely the existence of non-physical properties

Versi Word, Download DISINI
Apabila anda masuk https://adf.ly/ , cukup tunggu sebentar sampai muncul tombol dengan tulisan SKIP AD pada pojok kanan atas, lalu klik tombol tersebut.

No comments:

Post a Comment